How to Viciously Put Down Those Haters on the Right!

6a00d8341c60bf53ef0120a5fd1ba6970c-500wi

Over and over I see reports, opinion columns and commentary from the Left about the hatred, stupidity and racism of anyone associated with the Tea Parties.  I myself have never been to a TP demonstration, but I do look at all the information I can.  The actual videos I have seen show a calm and happy bunch of people, a strong contrast to the usual emotion of a Left-wing gathering.  I have also never seen any sign of the blatant racism that is supposed to prevail, especially in their signage…  Well, today Virginia we will be answering the folks with spittle flying from their red faces on their charge that Obama has inspired more hatred, venom and murderous/racist rhetoric in his racist opponents than the Great Satan George Bush II ever had to suffer. Oh, let it be known, I think Bush was/is a fool and, until a certain Chicago gentleman put his heiny in the hot seat, the WORST president in living memory! I mean really Virginia, how bloody embarrassing is it to follow someone like G.W., and in only one year have billboards asking “Miss Me Yet?” with G.W.’s beaming smirk; and in two years be TIED with him for the worst president in MSM polls?

The first claim we will demolish is that the anti-Obama signs are over-the-top and rabidly partisan compared to the Bush-era signs:

 

youworkforus912photo 6a00d8341c60bf53ef0133ecf23c64970b-500wi 912racecard antioslaves aprilteaparty arrogantmuslimalien assimilation912photo blackdevil912photo blackdevil2912photo drugsapjlmagana nazi6tonyramao1 racisthomophobicweirdness slavery912photo slide_1391_20046_large tpentitlement tpsandiego txtpperv

Now, if you call that over the top and hateful let us enter the Wayback Machine and see how things were in the Bush years:

 

wanted _44102171_afp416butt 090317-CalgaryBushProtest-13 1544055 59252901_d1a4b3ea19 76512324 Bush_Protest bush_protest_fu bush_raymondjames_p03 bushido bush-protest-shoe-052909  evil_bush_demon immokalee_photo_medium_01 jenin_tikkun_tikal MelissaAtSteeleBushProtest051130 n28_warpigs03 randydandy-PROTEST slide_1391_20046_large

okay… so it seems that the Lefties spewed at least as much venom at Bush… more from what I see.

Now, let us look at the signs that “imply violence” or “contain an implicit threat” directed at Obama lately…

unarmedthistime 912lynchmob 3917804382_4e1eaba387 gun gunman guns912photo guns3912photo keep_my_guns_large teapartyracism14 threat912photo

I do not see a lot of implied violence there, the closest is the one with his Pants On Fire… a phrase that seems to escape the Leftie who posted it under threats… he claimed it must be about “burning blacks out of their towns” (note the broken promises/lies littering the ground)

Now, once again we will compare to the above heinous examples of “Right-Wing bigotry and hatred” the mild and loving expressions of polite dissent with which the warm and caring Left-wingers showered Bush II:

 

save-mother-earth-kill-bush 1434350img 26450411-M BushWhackerElMarco cd6a881d86730419d2ca3fa9c0067613 Codepink Demonstrates Support Journalist Threw ia3z1tOhqX3l img9676b imheretokillbushsmall kill-all-losers kill-bush-protest-sign-zombietime paws_for_peace_fnb

Is it just me, or did those seem just a trifle more nasty, hateful and downright scary? Especially when they are coming from the political group that claims the “moral high ground” on so many issues of !!!

Ethics? WE don’t need Ethics! WE are The Good Guys(tm)!

Well then, how about the claims that labels of Nazi and comparisons with Hitler are something new to the political landscape; something heinous and in need to stamping out?

First, The anti-Obama signs that ring in the Hitler/Nazi theme…

nazi5 constitutionapjoseluismagans hitler nazi3

Hmm, not a lot there.. let us now look at the scant evidence of anti-Bush protestors using such hateful rhetoric

bush_protest_latam BushSS hitbush Stop_Bush_protest SubtleAntiBushSign _44431920_bush_protest_416ap anti-bush-protest-march-new-york-city

Wow Virginia, not much there is there? NOT!

So, now to the racism accusation… this one has a bit of truth to it, but note how an after-protest handbill left by an anonymous person and a handwritten sign by a young teen are the worst of the lot!!!

These first ones are pretty borderline, but still not bigoted, mostly just putting Obama in an uncomfortable comparison with racists of the past; in the “theft” one the victim is black and in the Uncle Sam poster Obama is NOT depicted as a gangster or thug, just a bastard… and that is certainly a legitimate political opinion…

blackcriminal912photo912slavprojection1antioconfedslittingsamthroataprilefavara

Now we finally get to the ones that actually have something to them;

welfarobama  

This one was just included in the list because it is so blatant… but, it was left AFTER a protest, no attribution, no claimant, could be by anyone, even a provocateur…

Here is one that Finally is no-doubt-allowed racist and stupid! But, note that it is the sign of a child just old enough to be off the leash; also, not a printed sign from any organized group…

 teapartysign1sm

Which brings us to the ONE sign I could find that is racist, un-supportable and simply hateful…

 090724-us-hc-racist

So, how did Bush II fair?

 120-2044_IMG  BlackProtestRepublicanNationalConveIMG_4544

Well, it seems that when it comes to hateful rhetoric, nasty slogans and just plain violent fantasies the Left edges out the Right by a nose…

  155-5568_IMGimagesCAI0AJ0L  ringobushitler15 ringobushitler17 IMG_0101 hillary_protest_photo_08

Putting These In The Right Hands Could Save America

It should be a law that all religious leaders, political leaders, pundits and elected officials must possess and regularly view the following four films as a Leader Hubris Prevention Measure.

I Propose an immediate vote on an LHM Amendment to the  US Constitution

holygrail0_ lifeofbrian0_ blazingsaddle_LiarLiar0_

           

Shirley Sherrod NAACP FULL Video Earns HALF an Apology

Here is the full NAACP video:

I love it when I am right!

In this post and the annotations to this video I made some guesses about the actual content of a rather severely spun edit of Shirley Sherrod’s NAACP talk…Turns out I was dead on the money!

Shirley was indeed referring to how she used to be” and lecturing he audience on how we need to be more color-blind; but she only manages to she that her own racism is still deeply embedded…

Speaking about the USDA jobs for minorities she speaks of it being biased toward hiring blacks, no problem with that but, instead of talking about how that opens a door for personal and career development she touts the Once you get a Federal Job as a Protected minority you are set for life” mindset!

She talks about no loans going to black business in Georgia from the stimulus…

What is a black business? Is this a business owned ONLY by blacks, or one that has blacks among the owners? Is it majority black ownership?

How many of these “black businesses” qualify for the loans?

How many have applied?

What is the percentage breakdown between black and white “owned” biz’s in Georgia that qualify and have applied?

Is marketing of the information regarding these loans evenly distributed across the state regardless of race?

Enquiring minds want to know Virginia!

Here are some telling quotes for those who claim she hasn’t a racist bone in her body…

“…coming out of slavery,Black people used to help each other; that’s how they built the schools that we have. Ya know… That’s how they bought the land that we have; that [we’ve let] by lost all of it. Ya know there are people [we/they?] had over 15 million acres and [theres?] black we have less than 2 million acres of farmland left. And we will sell it for nothing, for nothing! ”
“We found some honest lawyers; they were white… I wish I could say that about all lawyers, especially black lawyers – but they will nickel and dime you to death.”

(audience laughs)

“I am sorry but I do not have a good opinion of most lawyers.”…

“reach back and help somebody, that’s what we were taught, that’s what “our” folk did!”…
“it looks like the more, the better we do, the more free we are, the more divided we become”…

She sounds like Bill Cosby when he got in trouble for blaming blacks for not doing better in school and career.

“Its not abut black and white, well it IS about black and white, you know“…

And of course the knee-jerk reflex of the year, Republicans all oppose the health care bill …

“…Because they have a black president”

The American Population Have Willfully Become Immoral Idiots

corporateAmerica

I for one am getting rather tired of all the whining and moaning from all sides over the evils that have been inflicted upon us by the “forces of darkness“, also known as: Republicans, Democrats, Independents,Corporations, Racial Groups, Religious Groups, Foreign Groups; any group that is for whatever that particular whiner is against.

What really matters to most voters is not what they are accomplishing; it is all about preventing the opposition from carrying out their-heinous-agenda-destined-to-enslave-the-Human-race-forever-and-ever.  They define themselves not by what they are “for”, instead they define their existence, their life, on what they are against. Is it any wonder that politics is a morass of factionalism and lends very little of its time and energy to actually serving the public with genuine weal?

And these same voters all can see before them the one and only insurmountable barrier to political reform and campaign reform, indeed a complete “America reform“! They see it, they condemn it, they tell everyone that it must be “reformed”; and every man(woman)-jack of them plays, and protects, the very system they demonize; it is called campaign finance Virginia, and it must GO!

Why do politicians listen to anyone other than citizen voters? Why is voting seen as a valueless “right” by the majority of US citizens when they should regard it as a priceless privilege and duty? The answer to both is the same: we allow people to give politicians money.  Individuals, groups, companies, corporations vast and amorphous, all are allowed to BRIBE POLITICIANS; this is subject to almost laughable “rules” intended for [pretending we give a damn about] “protecting” the citizenry from “abuses” of this essentially irredeemable and malignant institution, all the while scheming for “our side” to game the system.

Take a moment people, think about it and admit your guilt! Americans like to think they might be able to buy their way to control in the name of their own personal “way to Utopia” regardless of the merit of any particular idea put forth by the “opposition”. But, imagine what things would be like if there were no campaign donations period, end of sentence. No. Campaign. Donations.

The basic idea is also simple. Just make ALL elected politicians campaign with money provided by an evenly divided taxpayer provided pool. Once a candidate is on the ballot they would be equal in the eyes of those in the electorate not already familiar with their record; if the same professionally neutral production companies were used and the same budgets given to each, why the best man(woman) just might have a chance of winning!

But, the American electorate knows this and does nothing. They, yes, I mean you, chase after your own slice of the corruption while not lifting a finger to take action, or even speak about just doing away with the whole toxic institution as easily as Herr Obama nationalized whole swaths of privately owned business; but, this time it would be not a theft, but a returning of sovereignty to where it belongs, in the hands of We The People!

Let us go further and declare a campaign able to buy products and impersonal services (printing flyers & buttons, ads, catering, security, etc.) but, prevent them from HIRING anyone for anything more creative than emptying the trashcans at the office! Yes, Virginia, let us prevent anyone from being a professional politician elector! No hired writers, artists, designers, agitators, petition collectors or “political advisors”; in the case of things like television production all candidates in a particular election should be confined to using the same production company which will be selected by competitive bid.

The idea behind this addition is that if you have to hire people to get your message across your message is probably not that important to anyone but you. If something needs to happen it will generate the zeal in citizens to do something about it without anyone making a living from it and automatically biasing the process!

Think about it my people, other than as a defense of your dreams of a forlorn hope that your personal brand of righteousness might “win” using corrupt and dirty methods, then shed them like butterfly leaving behind its worminess to produce a thing of beauty, what cause do you have to not rise up and demand campaign financing to END?

It is inimically self-righteous selfishness that has resulted in our giving money the rights of a citizen. Money represents nothing more than the collective productivity of a nation. Money is nothing but a system of tokens that we use to keep track of productivity as we trade it amongst ourselves and other nations.

Taken it objectively: this perversion of Western politics means that whoever can amass (by hook or by crook, only the end total matters) a large portion of this collection of game counters has the right to more “free speech” than those citizens, equal in numbers and passion, who are not as good at the economical game.  Doesn’t this concept go violently against both Conservative and Liberal ideals?!? Why does it continue then, when real power (the Vote) still is in the hands of the citizens?

Because too many people think THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO USE IT THEMSELVES, and so excuse it!  So Americans should stop whining about not having influence America, we are getting exactly what we wanted and what we deserve.

Why Does MY Party Need Ethics Laws? WE Are The GOOD GUYS!

26812208v2_225x225_Front

Partisans suck on both sides!

Anyone who thinks their party is somehow less corrupt in its own way than the “opposition” deserves whatever idiots they elect!
Classic Liberals hold up as an ideal the underdog successfully gaming a corrupt system; the Conservatively oriented uphold the concept of WORKING the, not perfect but necessary, system for success.

But, the Leftist believes that “The System”, or “The Man” is ALWAYS inimical; while a Liberal understands that this is something to be guarded against while not an inherent facet of all “authority.”

The Right-winger holds the belief that those within the system are somehow protected from being abusive, and corrupt within the rules…
Obviously these are both utter fallacies!

Leftists seek to game the system; to use self-righteousness as a champion of “the downtrodden and powerless” as an excuse to do things that would make their blood boil if attempted by “the other side”!

Liberal thought respects the gaming of the system by truly oppressed folk, while also respecting the honesty and integrity of those in the majority who play by the rules of the healthy systems to prosper.

But the “leadership” of “Left” and “right” promote the idea that THEIR fantasy is the ONLY valid attitude, and the only one that DECENT people would follow.

I have TWO things to say to both mentalities; the 2nd thing I want to say to them is…”and the horse you rode in on”!

http://hereticscrusade.com

Politically Correct Hate Crime and Terrorism in The 21st Century: Heretics Crusade on CafePress

Heretics Crusade Slogans and Designs can be purchased on everything from buttons and stickers to shirts and yard signs

Help Support the Heretics Crusade!

politicallyCorrecthateCrimeStringTank

21st Century Guide
To
Politically Correct Hate Crime

White Males
It Is Hate Speech If You Offend:
Minorities, LGBTs, Females or Muslims

Christians
It Is Hate Speech If You Offend: Females or non-Christians; Especially Muslims

Minorities
It Is Hate Speech If You Offend: Muslims

LBGTs
It Is Hate Speech If You Offend: Minorities or Muslims

Jews
It Is Hate Speech If You Offend: Minorities, Females or Muslims

Non-Abrahamic Religious
It Is Hate Speech If You Offend: Anyone

Females
It Is Hate Speech If You Offend: Minorities, LBGTs or Muslims

Muslims
It Is Hate Speech To Offend: Your Imam

 

21stcenturyterrorismcapsleeve

21st Century Terrorism

(You Can’t Tell The “REAL” Victims Without a Scorecard)

Stage One
Threats Are Issued
By
Radical Muslims

Stage Two
Threats Are Carried Out
By
“Completely Secular Terrorists” Who Don’t Even LIKE Religion
(But Are VERY Upset About Israel)

Stage Three
Explanation of How The Dead Provoked “All of Islam” Delivered
By
“Moderate”Muslims

Stage Four
Agreement that The Victim’s “aggression” Provoked The Attack
By
“Western” Leftists

Heretical Thoughts Of The Day

cRUSADE

What is money? To most people money is wealth, it is what they think of as the end result of time, labor and ingenuity.  In the view of conventional wisdom money is to the economy as steel ingots are to a steel mill; the result and end purpose of the institution.

Conventional wisdom, the public and virtually every "economist" making their livings by distorting reality to conform to political visions are wrong. Money is none of that. Wealth consists of the things we produce that last and can be traded amongst ourselves or that enhance the ease of trading or the quality of life for all (ie. roads, bridges, parks, hospitals, schools, etc.).

While services are a vital component of a truly modern economy (see CIA World Factbook for percentages of GDP invested in services in 1st, 2nd and third world countries.), it is only those parts of the economy that *create* lasting goods or universal public services (ie. not ones used only by certain segments of the population and no others.) that truly add to the wealth of a nation.

Yes Virginia, money is not wealth, wealth is only some of what money can buy.  But then what is money?  Money is the set of tokens we use to keep track of who owes what to who. It is also can be seen as a token set for power, but that is secondary and dependent in the long term on how much real wealth is behind a particular collection of tokens.  Money is not wealth, wealth is wealth and forgetting the difference is the only real reason the economists cannot ever seem to agree on what works and what does not.

How does a country raise its wealth without major inflation? Not by simply running the printing presses; wealth must be created to back those new tokens or the "value" of the all of the tokens diminishes.  What needs to be done is to simply decide what things we want to raise our national wealth with, then do it.

I hear gasps of outrage from all sides already, but I stand behind my statement.  If you build it, they will come. 

The bottom line is that if you want to help the economy you need to spend money on things that are still there next year, and the year after that, and the decade after that.  The more spent on paper shuffling zeros and administrative overhead, or services that vanish as soon as they are provided the less wealth and the more inflation we will have.

It is that simple people, go get on your pols about it!

What is the Difference Between RightWing and Leftist?

 I have been wondering a lot lately on just what the real difference is between partisans on the Left and pastisans on the Right. I think I have finally put my finger on it; Rightwingers WORK the System while Leftists main strategy is to GAME the System.

Both abuse the system by using their stategy to increase their incluence beyond their representation in voters actual opinions.

More later on this subject…

Political Parties Exist to Subvert Instead of Enable the Voice of the Individual.

heretics-crusade,guy-dewhitney,partisan

My Life for Ze Party und Ze Leader!

Why is it again that, in 2010, political parties still exist? Well, other than for the implimentation of the control of a few who claim the voice of many, I don’t see much reason; member voices are given more lip service than respect from the party’s “leaders”. And, while we are attacking preconception, why a party “leader”? Would not an “impementor” be a more appropriate term for the desired function of the office.? Someome trusted to make the will of the members of the party heard effectively?

But how is that again? A party is supposed to make the voice of its X number of citizens louder than this other bunch’s equal number of voices?

Do you people out there ever completey agree with every part of “your” party’s platform? If one election cycle you do happen to agree with it all have you ever in your life seen the party hold to each and every plank after the election?
Remind me again Virginia; just WHO these parties claim to serve?

A Modestly Heretical Proposal

Get rid of the parties. No labels to hide behind, no pols in pocket of biz or party, pols un-electable without personal support from the community, pol has to listen on every issue and best of all, the most important, the pol would be judged more by accomplishments and record than by their associations.

Today there is no practical reason not to elect individual candidates directly.

Not sure you like the idea? Think about this: neither. Obama nor Palin would have ever been nominated without an agenda following party forcing them upon their supporters. Think about that for a while…

Posted with WordPress for BlackBerry.

LimBamian Politics 101: 2010 The Limbaugh-Obama Mentality Takes Hold

idylls king 0013

In 2010 we have fully entered a new era of politics that I call the Limbaugh-Obama, or LimBama period.

This era’s new mentality is neither Left nor Right wing. Instead it applies equally to both sides of the political spectrum,indeed all sides.  It is the ability to purport to believe in republican democracy and the Constitution, while firmly believing that political perfection is only prevented by the “Opposition” being allowed to participate in the legislative process.

The Constitution is replaced (ideologically at least, for the WORDs “The Constitution” will still ring out when freedom is but a memory) by the simple rule:

WE do not HAVE to play “fair” because WE ARE THE GOOD GUYS!

The because part of this unwritten commandment comes in many forms in the minds of partisans:

We defend the downtrodden and repressed

We have God (Allah) in our hearts and you are fooled by Satan

We serve the long-term interest of Human Survival

We serve Mother Earth

Yada, yada, yada… it is all a bunch of self serving baloney from minds so lost in group think that they can’t SEE the surface of the swamp let alone know their common sense had drowned!

It all only has ONE ‘because’:

Because WE WANT THE POWER, though we prove by our methods that we do not deserve it, and will surely abuse it for our selfish personal goals.