Who is Anita Dunn?

Is Anita Dunn a space alien or maybe a foreign spy? Is she the product of a secret lab in the Nevada desert? Is she possibly even that worst of all things: a Canadian? Glenn Beck, amongst others is talking about what Dunn has said, but I don’t see anyone discussing who she is. All I do know is that information online about her life before 1977 is nonexistent.

The White House does not list any C.V. or bio for her. The Washington Post has a profile that lists her as 51 years old but gives no birth date. It is a cheering section for her professional career more than a bio.

Basic background information on White House Communications Director Anita Dunn starts with her plum job in the Carter White House, leaving her biography half missing. I might be naïve, but I thought that presidential appointees to White House positions were important public figures. From the reactions to Ms. Dunn in the media it seems that I was wrong.

I myself find it just a little distressing to learn that a major player in D.C. seems to have appeared out of nowhere to work for Jimmy Carter’s chief of staff. I find it even more disturbing that media outlets who go over judicial and cabinet appointments with a microscope don’t know if President Obama‘s Director of Communication went to college. But no one in the press seems to care about anything other than her comments attacking Fox News and her deep respect for Chairman Mao and his statement that “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”

In fact, other than the Fox comments and reactions to her praise of Mao, all I could find was this bit at WhoRunsGov.com:

Current Position: White House Communications Director (since May 2009)

Career History: Senior adviser for strategic communications (April 2008 to November 2008); Director of Hopefund (May 2006 to December 2006); Political adviser at Squier Knapp Dunn (1993 to 2009)

Birthday: N/A, Hometown: N/A, Alma Mater: N/A, Spouse: Robert Bauer, Religion: N/A, DC Office: N/A, Email N/A

I did find out that Ms. Dunn did not want a visible role in the Obama White House. Indeed, she had not wanted a White House job at all. Until her unfortunately public expression of reverence for Chairman Mao blipped the media’s radar, she had gotten her wish. Now, as the furor dies down the only one that has had little to say has been Ms. Dunn.

How old is she? Where was she born? Where did she grow up? What schooling and degrees does she have and from which institutions? What led her to be given a job in the White House by Jimmy Carter in the first place? As far as the internet is concerned, no one seems to know. There isn’t even a mention of what town she grew up in.

Color me stupid but should the media allow any president to hire without comment someone with no public history to be the director of White House Communications? Someone whose only public utterance of personal thought seems to be an admiration for Mao, the biggest mass murderer in history?

Why is it that the mainstream media have ignored the lack of even a hometown or a college degree in her public profiles? Do they know something I do not? Maybe I have the scoop this time and Glenn Beck is soon to break the story. Or Rush Limbaugh may seek Anita’s hand in marriage when her All-American background is revealed. Either way it turns out, I would like to know.

Instead of asking her who she’s kidding maybe the pundits should be asking her who she is.

We Must All Hang Together With Fox News, Or Assuredly We Shall All Hang Separately

That’s Treason Glenn!
Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion and the Free Press all seem to be under assault in the West. Progressives and Totalitarians are moving to put Free Speech in chains. No country in the West is immune to their attacks.
From Vienna to Venice Beach we see Socialists, Marxists and Islamists moving to eliminate freedom of speech, religion and the press under the cover of “tolerance” and “multiculturalism”. With many Western leaders complacent or complicit it is past time for a light to shine on this agenda.
Even the U.S. President seems to have been seduced by this movement and its slippery logic.
NBC’s Savannah Guthrie interviewed the man to whom Americans look to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”.
Ms. Guthrie’s second question for the President made me sit up and take notice. The question was regarding the continuing controversy about FOX News Channel being cut out of the Real Media™ © 2009:
Savannah Guthrie: “…do you think it is appropriate for the White House to say what is or what is not a news organization?”
Obama: ”I think that, understandably since you are in the news business, this is something you are very interested in. I think the American People are a lot more interested in what we are doing to create jobs or how we are handling the situation in Afghanistan.”
S.G.: “Fair enough …but your advisors raised this issue.”
Obama: ”well no, the, uh, I think that what our advisors have simply said is that we are going to take, uh, media as it comes. And if media is basically operating as a “Talk Radio” format then that is one thing, if it is operating as a news outlet that’s another. But it is not something that I am losing sleep over.”
Let us translate the President’s political speech into plain English with the SpinTron 3000 running Kumquat’s iPolitician 2.0 so that we may react to his unfiltered ideas.
iObama: ”I think that, understandably since you are in the [Free Press], [government suppression of dissenting press] is something you are very interested in. I think the American People are a lot more interested in what we are doing [ to pretend] to create jobs or how we are [avoiding] handling the situation in Afghanistan.”
iGuthrie: “[Cool with me boss.] …but your advisors [initiated] this [confrontation and blacklisting].”
iObama: “NO, [o.k. yes, but the reasons WHY make it ok] we are going to take, uh, media as it comes. And if media is basically operating as a [“Free Opposition Press”] format then that [puts them on our black-list], if it is operating as a [“properly deferential” Free Press] that’s [allowable]. But it is not something [my agenda will stumble] over.
No Savannah, not fair or enough. Did no one teach Mr. Obama about Thomas Jefferson? Expedience and politics are no substitute for integrity and the Constitution.
Jefferson: “The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”
“Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.”
“The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty and property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves, nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.”
“I am… for freedom of the press, and against all violations of the Constitution to silence by force and not by reason the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their agents.”
“The only security of all is in a free press. The force of public opinion cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed. The agitation it produces must be submitted to. It is necessary, to keep the waters pure.”
How long will it be before President Obama’s naïve introduction of the Orwellian concept of a media blacklist leads to the silencing of not just networks but individual outlets and citizens who fear to anger “The State”?
Already the White House’s chill on the Free Press has produced frost damage. “Journalists” from the middle to the left of the spectrum are voicing their approval of the president’s declaring war on Conservative media. Dan Rather of HD-Net is on record saying the tactic:
Rather: “… has been very effective. And they [The White House] take the attitude that nobody gets a “no-risk shot” at our president. You take a shot and we’ll shoot back, [which] strikes me as sound strategy…”
Time and time again we are told that Free Speech means nothing if it does not allow unpopular opinions to be heard. I do not think there is much doubt what the likes of Jefferson, Franklin, Paine and Locke would have to say about what is happening in the White House today.
Regardless of the Party in office this is an issue that strikes at the heart of all American freedoms. It is past time for Americans to start standing up for what they believe. For my closing I will again turn to Thomas Jefferson, the most passionate Moderate politician in American history.
“To preserve the freedom of the human mind… and freedom of the press, every spirit should be ready to devote itself to martyrdom; for as long as we may think as we will and speak as we think, the condition of man will proceed in improvement.” Thomas Jefferson to William Green Munford, 1799.”